Archives
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
|
Country-of-Origin Labeling Survives Committee Vote
The Packer
November 19, 2001
The Packer | November 16, 2001 | By Larry Waterfield WASHINGTON, D.C. - On Nov. 15 the Senate Agriculture Committee, on a largely partisan vote of 11-10, approved a new farm bill that includes several new provisions to assist the produce industry. At one point the lawmakers voted to remove country-of-origin labeling for produce and meat, but later Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., got the committee to put it back in the bill. Donna Dennison, government affairs director for the United Fresh Fruit & Vegetable Association, Alexandria, Va., said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., helped pass several key provisions to assist the produce industry, including a phased-in program to buy commodities for government programs that starts at $130 million a year and reaches $200 million in five years. "Stabenow was the champion for the industry," Dennison said. The committee approved a pilot project of $25 million in 15 states to establish a domestic promotion program for fruits and vegetables. Money will also be provided to help producers of tree fruits by covering 75% of the cost of lost trees and vines. Exporters will get help with Market Access Program spending that rises to $200 million a year. APPLE HELP In other action, the full Senate on Nov. 15 passed the agricultural appropriations bill that contains $75 million in help for apple growers. The measure, which also passed in the House, was then sent to the White House for the President’s signature. Apple growers had asked for $150 million, the figure originally passed by the House but reduced in conference. COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN LABELING The country-of-origin labeling measure was at first defeated in the agriculture committee by a vote of 12 to 9, with two Democrats, Zell Miller of Georgia and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas joining Republicans to defeat the labeling, which was a part of a title in the bill dealing with competition in agriculture. That whole section was voted out. It would have created a special office at USDA to deal with issues of competition and unfair trade practices. Later, Wellstone offered country-of-origin labeling as a new amendment, and the committee passed it. A House-passed farm bill also contains country-of-origin labeling. The House made it a floor amendment despite opposition from retailers and importers. SENATE HAGGLING Senate committee members haggled over the details of the huge farm bill, including funding levels for commodity support programs, conservation, food stamps and nutrition. Harkin, the committee chairman, got approval of a measure to increase food stamp funding by $6.2 billion over ten years. The House figure is only $3.6 billion. The committee agreed to extend food stamps to former welfare recipients for six months. The final Senate bill is likely to differ in major ways from the House-passed bill, but both bills are expected to continue big support programs for Midwest grain farmers. The White House denounced the House-passed bill and has offered no support for the Harkin-backed proposal. The Bush administration says both versions are too costly and are anti-competitive because of the support programs. The White House has backed an alternative bill offered by Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind. However, Democrats control the Senate and the Senate Agriculture Committee, which severely reduced the chances of the Lugar bill being adopted. In the final vote, Democrats voted for the new farm bill and Republicans voted against it. © 2000-2001 Vance Publishing Corp.
NOTICE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for research and
educational purposes.
|