Archives
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
|
Better than ethanol
CNN Money
April 3, 2007
By Steve Hargreaves
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- All of a sudden, everybody hates ethanol. Among the criticisms: Ethanol takes more energy to produce than it yields ... it can't be easily shipped ... it's driving up the price of food ... it's perverse to put food in fuel tanks while people starve. Now a partnership between two corporate heavy weights - BP (Charts) and DuPont (Charts) - aims to commercialize Biobutanol, a fuel similar to ethanol but with a few important advantages. The question is: Can they make it cheap enough? Biobutanol's first advantage: it packs more power. Conventional corn-based ethanol - the kind most widely produced in the United States - is only about 70 percent as efficient as gasoline. This means consumers have to use more of it to drive the same amount of miles. Green is good
Biobutanol, on the other hand, is nearly as efficient as gasoline, according to Reese Tisdale, a project consultant at the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Emerging Energy Research. Second, biobutanol doesn't absorb water like ethanol does. So instead of having to be shipped separately and blended with gasoline closer to the filling station, biobutanol could be added to gasoline right at the refiner and shipped via the same pipeline, and share other infrastructure with petroleum-based fuels. "[Biobutanol] answers a lot of the questions ethanol can't," said Tisdale. "In my mind, it makes more sense." The production of biobutanol is nearly identical to ethanol. They both ferment a food crop to yield a fuel. The only difference is the enzyme. And like cellulosic ethanol, which can be made using any plant matter, not just food crops - finding the right enzyme at the right price is the trick. In a recent interview with the magazine Technology Review, BP's biofuels head Philip New said a pilot program to produce biobutanol economically should be running soon - some have speculated this year - with a wider rollout by the end of the decade. But New was vague about whether a major technological breakthrough was still needed for the fuel to be commercially viable, saying only "Both BP and DuPont are very positive, committed, and optimistic about the prospects of delivering butanol." A BP spokeswoman, reached by CNNMoney.com, clarified New's comments, saying "BP doesn't believe there will be one major breakthrough, but a number of breakthroughs that can build upon each other and progress the technology." A spokeswoman for Valero (Charts), the nation's largest independent refiner and a blender of gasoline, said the company had heard of biobutanol but didn't feel it was economical. Scientists at the government's National Renewable Energy Laboratory are cautiously optimistic, suggesting a breakthrough with the enzyme is still needed. "It has potential," said Andy Aden, a senior research engineer at NREL. "But it's hard to say what the timeline might be." Aden said he supported the development of biobutanol simply to diversify the nation's fuel choice as it seeks to use less gasoline, although he said NREL is still counting on cellulosic ethanol to become the main gasoline substitute. He did say that it's not like ethanol and biobutanol are really competing, as they both use the same feedstock, can be made it the same factory and can be blended together. While biobutanol may solve the transportation and efficiency problems with ethanol, it still relies on a food crop for its feed stock. Using corn to make ethanol has caused corn prices to surge, which in turn can push up the prices of other foods that rely on corn - like meat fed with corn meal or soda made with corn syrup. If a cheap enzyme can be found to make cellulosic ethanol, then it's hoped a similar enzyme can be found to make biobutanol out of wood chips or switch grass as well. But until then, "It faces the same food-for-fuel questions," said Tisdale, "and that's definitely a big thing."
NOTICE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for research and
educational purposes.
|